This paper appeals with the difference between the traditional and communicative teaching methods of teaching the Chinese language. We propose the comparative analysis method which allows us on one hand to compare both methods, on the other hand to choose the most appropriate method for teaching students according to their age and goals of learning. As the example we use declarative clause with simple verbal predicate because this grammatical feature is fundamental in linguistics. This paper contains virtues and short comings of the traditional and communicative methods, describes which method to choose to develop oral speech comprehension or writing comprehension. It also has information how to use the methods to teach declarative clause with simple verbal predicate in practice as the example. The paper can be used for the beginners in teaching as well as for those who has some experience in teaching the Chinese language, for the individual teaching as well as for teaching in groups. The grammatical feature taken as the example in this paper is not special only for the Chinese language, so it can be used also for teaching other languages.
本文针对传统教学法与交际教学法的差异提出了自己的看法。我们提出了比较分析法,一方面可以比较这两种方法,另一方面可以根据学生的年龄和学习目标选择最适合的教学方法。作为例子,我们使用简单动词谓语的陈述句,因为这一语法特征是语言学的基本特征。本文分析了传统方法和交际方法的优缺点,阐述了在口语理解和写作理解中应选择哪一种方法。并以简单动词谓语陈述句的教学为例,介绍了如何在实际教学中运用这些方法。本文既可供初学者使用,也可供有一定汉语教学经验者参考,也可用于个别教学和小组教学。本文所举的语法特征不仅是汉语特有的,所以把它也可以用于其他语言的教学。